Best Prop Trading Firms
Funding programs compared on profit split, drawdown rules, and payout reliability. Sort the table or compare up to three side by side.
| Compare | Name | Profit split | Max funding | Payouts | Platforms | Actions | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 FTMOCommercial Register, Municipal Court in Prague regulated | 4.7 | 80% (2-Step, scaling to 90%) or 90% from the start (1-Step) | $200,000 per account (Scaling Plan to $2 million combined) | Every 14 days | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView | Visit | |
 The5ersUK Companies House regulated | 4.5 | 50-75% starting split, scaling up to 100% at the top tier | $4,000,000 through the scaling program | Every 14 days (first request 14 days after the funded account is activated) | MT5 | Visit | |
 FundedNextDubai Department of Economy and Tourism (DED) regulated | 4.5 | 80% standard (90% add-on available), scaling to 95% | $200,000 per CFD account (scaling program to $4 million); futures allocations to roughly $700,000 | Every 14 days after a first payout at 21 days (Stellar 2-Step); every 5 business days (Stellar 1-Step) | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView, Proprietary | Visit | |
 Alpha Capital GroupUK Companies House (company registration only — not FCA-authorized or a regulated financial services entity) regulated | 4.3 | 80% standard (up to 90% via add-on or Alpha Direct) | $2,000,000 (scaling) | Bi-weekly or on-demand (from 2% gross profit); requests paid within two business days | MT5, cTrader, Proprietary | Visit | |
 Funding PipsCompany registration only — Mwali International Services Authority (Comoros), not a financial regulator regulated | 4.3 | 60%-100% depending on payout cadence (up to 100% on Hot Seat/monthly) | $300,000 per account, scalable toward $2,000,000 | Weekly (Tuesday Payday), bi-weekly, monthly, or on-demand after qualifying | MT5, cTrader | Visit | |
 TopstepCFTC / NFA regulated | 4.2 | 90% from the first dollar (Express Funded Account) | $150,000 buying power (Trading Combine account sizes) | On request after 5 winning days of $150+ (Standard path) or 3 days under the 40% consistency target; up to 50% of the balance, capped at $5,000-$6,000 per request | Proprietary, TradingView | Visit | |
 E8 MarketsCompany registration only, not a financial regulator — Texas limited liability company; no registration number published regulated | 3.8 | 80% fixed (E8 Signature); selectable 80%, 90% or 100% (E8 One) | $500,000 (E8 One) | On-demand after a 14-day initial window, with 5 profitable days between requests (E8 One, E8 Signature); daily payouts on E8 Zero futures accounts | MT5, cTrader, Proprietary | Visit | |
 FunderProMalta Business Registry (company registration only — not licensed by the MFSA or any financial regulator) regulated | 3.5 | 80% standard (90% with add-on or on Pro accounts) | $5,000,000 scaling | Bi-weekly from $100 profit on Classic and One Phase; weekly at 90% or daily at a reduced 60% split on Pro | MT5, cTrader, Proprietary | Visit |
Head-to-head comparisons
Comparisons →- Topstep vs FTMOTopstep and FTMO are both long-established, well-trusted prop firms, but they fund traders in different markets entirely. Topstep, founded in Chicago in 2010, is a futures-only firm whose live funded accounts run through an NFA-registered introducing broker — real regulatory infrastructure most CFD-style prop firms lack. FTMO, founded in Prague in 2015, funds forex, indices, commodities, crypto, and stock CFDs through simulated accounts with no futures product. This is less a head-to-head on identical terms and more a choice between asset classes: futures traders should look at Topstep, forex/CFD traders should look at FTMO.
- Funding Pips vs FundedNextFunding Pips and FundedNext are both Dubai-founded prop firms launched within months of each other in 2022, and both built their reputations on fast payouts and flexible challenge formats rather than FTMO-style seniority. Funding Pips offers the most granular payout-cadence-versus-split tradeoff in the industry, plus a genuine no-evaluation Zero model; FundedNext counters with a simpler weekly cycle backed by a delay-compensation guarantee and a larger scaling ceiling. Both are unregulated offshore firms, so the decision comes down to fee structure, rule tolerance, and how each firm's funded-stage restrictions fit your trading style.
- FunderPro vs FundedNextFunderPro and FundedNext both offer daily-or-weekly payout options and multiple challenge formats, but they carry different trust profiles. FunderPro, a Malta-registered firm launched in 2023, had a Trustpilot consumer warning attached to its profile in January 2026 over suspicious review activity, and independent reviewers cite a low pass rate and payout denials tied to IP-sharing allegations. FundedNext, a Dubai firm founded in 2022, has a longer track record and a stable, unflagged Trustpilot presence with a $1,000 delay-compensation guarantee on its weekly payouts. For most traders, FundedNext's clean review status is the deciding factor.
- FTMO vs The5ersFTMO and The5ers are both long-running prop firms founded within a year of each other (2015 and 2016), but they take opposite approaches to funding. FTMO uses a single evaluation model with an immediate 80-90% split and a $2 million scaling ceiling; The5ers offers genuine instant-funding programs alongside traditional evaluations, a starting split as low as 50%, but a scaling path that can reach 100% and $4 million. The choice depends on whether you want to skip the evaluation entirely, and how much you value a higher starting split versus a longer-term ceiling.
- FTMO vs FundedNextFTMO is the decade-old benchmark of the prop-trading industry, built on a single well-documented rule set and a reported $650 million+ paid out since 2015. FundedNext is a younger, Dubai-based firm founded in 2022 that has grown fast on faster payouts and higher maximum profit splits. The decision usually comes down to whether you prioritize FTMO's longer trust record and permissive trading rules, or FundedNext's weekly payout cycle, lower entry fees, and 95% scaled profit split.
- E8 Markets vs Alpha Capital GroupE8 Markets and Alpha Capital Group are both prop firms founded in 2021 offering multiple challenge formats and deep scaling ceilings, but they carry different trust signals. E8 Markets currently has no public Trustpilot score after the platform removed a batch of fake reviews and withheld the rating; Alpha Capital Group has kept its public rating with over 20,000 reviews skewing mostly positive, alongside its own share of payout-dispute complaints. Both are unregulated firms trading simulated capital, so the real decision points are challenge format flexibility, instrument range, and how much weight you put on E8's current review-transparency issue.
Related guides
All guides →- What Is Negative Balance Protection in Forex Trading?Negative balance protection explained: what it covers, which regulators require it, and which broker entities actually guarantee it in 2026.
- Prop Firm Payouts: How They Actually Work in 2026How prop firm payouts work in 2026: profit splits, payout frequency, refundable fees, and what actually gets paid out at firms like FTMO and Funding Pips.
- Prop Firm Drawdown Rules Explained (Trailing vs. Static)How prop firm drawdown rules work in 2026: daily vs. maximum drawdown, trailing vs. static calculation, and real limits from FTMO, FundedNext, and others.